RegBot
Integrations
- MetricStream
- Archer
- SAP
- Microsoft Azure
Pricing Details
- Pricing is typically volume-based, contingent on the number of jurisdictions, regulators, and users licensed for the platform.
Features
- RegBrain AI Engine
- Global Regulatory Radar (180+ Countries)
- Automated Policy & Control Mapping
- Multi-lingual NLP (60 Languages)
- Two-way Open API Connectors
- Expert-validated HITL Assurance
Description
CUBE: Automated Regulatory Intelligence (ARI) Assessment
CUBE functions as a high-scale regulatory orchestration layer designed for global financial institutions. Its primary technical differentiator is the RegPlatform, which transforms unstructured data from over 2,000 issuing bodies into structured, actionable intelligence 📑.
Semantic Mapping and Regulatory Radar
The platform employs an AI-first approach to 'Regulatory Change Management' (RCM), utilizing a proprietary taxonomy to filter noise and map relevant obligations 🧠.
- Automated Classification: CUBE's RegBrain categorizes regulatory updates by intent and jurisdictional relevance, moving beyond simple keyword matching 📑.
- Dynamic Mapping: The engine identifies granular compliance gaps by aligning external mandates directly with internal controls and policies 📑.
- Golden Source Monitoring: Continuous ingestion from over 10,000 issuing bodies in 60 languages ensures a comprehensive data foundation 📑.
⠠⠉⠗⠑⠁⠞⠑⠙⠀⠃⠽⠀⠠⠁⠊⠞⠕⠉⠕⠗⠑⠲⠉⠕⠍
Architectural Components and Integration
CUBE is built as a cloud-native SaaS platform, emphasizing interoperability with existing GRC (Governance, Risk, and Compliance) ecosystems 🧠.
- Open API Connectors: Enables two-way integration with systems like MetricStream and Archer, facilitating the export of mapped regulatory risk data 📑.
- Human-in-the-Loop (HITL): Utilizes over 250 in-house subject matter experts to validate AI-generated insights, ensuring high-fidelity output for Tier 1 institutions 📑.
- Managed Persistence: While the specific database layer is proprietary, the architecture supports automated audit trails and decision rationale tracking 🧠.
Operational Scenario: Global Policy Alignment
- Input: A new regulatory update is published by the EBA (European Banking Authority).
- Process: CUBE ingests the text, translates it via NLP, and identifies it as relevant to the firm's 'Market Conduct' policy 🧠.
- Output: An automated impact analysis report and a real-time alert sent to the assigned policy owner 📑.
Evaluation Guidance
- Taxonomy Alignment: Technical evaluators must verify how CUBE’s internal taxonomy maps to their organization's existing internal risk framework 🌑.
- API Latency: Assess the real-time processing speed of the Open API connectors when handling high-volume regulatory shifts 🧠.
- Translation Fidelity: Validate the accuracy of LLM-based translations for complex legal terminology in non-core jurisdictions 🌑.
Release History
Year-end update: Release of the Legal Mesh. Real-time API integration with 50+ national gazettes for sub-minute reaction to regulatory shifts.
Launch of Agentic Workflows. AI agents now proactively suggest specific edits to internal company policies to align with new laws.
New feature: Mapping. Automatically links similar regulations across different countries (e.g., GDPR vs. CCPA) to streamline global compliance.
Introduction of Semantic Delta. Automatically highlights meaningful changes between document versions, ignoring purely formatting edits.
Added Japan (e-Gov) and Canada support. Integrated LLM-based translation for instant summaries of foreign-language legal acts.
Launched ML-driven impact assessment. Predicts potential compliance costs and operational risks based on historical legal precedents.
Expanded coverage to EU (EUR-Lex) and UK. Introduced 'Regulatory Sentiment' to assess the strictness of new amendments.
Initial release. Core functionality: automated monitoring of US Federal Regulations (CFR) with keyword-based email alerts.
Tool Pros and Cons
Pros
- Automated tracking
- Real-time alerts
- Centralized data
- Time savings
- Improved accuracy
Cons
- Monthly cost
- Data source accuracy
- Limited customization